I'm not sure what it is about allergies; but I find that the farther I delve into them the more aware of our environmental impact I become.
Part of it is the quest for a cause, which may lead to a cure. Part of it is becoming aware of the way our food chain works, which raises more questions than it seems to answer. And part of it is simply that the more aware I am of what is IN food, the less I want it in my (or my kids') bodies. It's not about avoiding allergens. It's about our safety, and our society's sustainability.
What would we do if suddenly massive truck routes were made impassable? If we were forced to eat fresh produce and meat without grains?
This happened in parts of Europe during the second world war. This dangerous diet led to...increased health. But, during the second world war, we still had memories of how to farm. We had a little extra space to garden. We had memories of how to prepare and preserve our own food, or there were plenty of people around who could teach us.
And there were a lot fewer of us to feed. In an age of microwaves, freezers and take out containers, how many would know how to plan and execute a month's worth of meals if heaven forbid there were no more factory food deliveries? There's a commercial that we used to laugh at. "Without us, some guys would starve".
"So true," we joked.
But when we entered the realm of food allergies and started cooking from scratch, we stopped laughing. With an increased awareness of ingredients, and additives, and the true definition of cooking from scratch, the jingle seemed too hit too close to home. And all of these realizations led us to an increased awareness of sustainability.
Allergies themselves are overwhelming, especially when you have a slew of them that require multiple pages to list. Corn being one of the toughest allergies to live with, since it even shows up in the citric acid rinse on bagged salad. Sustainability isn't a main concern.
And yet, it is. Corn is the number one source cited when companies talk about environmentally friendly "green" resources. But it isn't sustainable. It isn't a sustainable crop, it requires a lot of gunk to grow industrially, and then it takes a lot of energy and effort to turn cobs into something that doesn't resemble a kernel, an ear or a husk. It's just natural, and sounds more sustainable than petroleum and plastic.
I now look at food in a new light. I wonder about the modifications we've put it through the past several decades. Trying to grow a better variety, something easier or hardier or simply more aesthetically pleasing. I wonder about the cost of our actions. The loss of heirloom varieties of plants, the loss of diversity. I worry about what exactly is coursing through the veins of my children. I've seen the detrimental effects of food dyes on Bumblebee. I've seen a playful Penguin double over, pale and sweaty, from a simple snack.
I hear them complain of random tummy aches or mild headaches, and I wonder what else might be going on. I look at ingredient lists and ask myself why, exactly, they need BHT or TBHQ. Xanthan gum might improve the texture, but how much can a body really handle? And what about all those synthetic vitamins? Grown en masse in laboratories to try and replace some of the nutrients lost in the soil from our poor farming practices, do our bodies know what to do with them? And the process itself can't be especially good for the environment.
None of this would ever have been given more than a fleeting thought, I'm certain, if it weren't for the food allergies. I used to figure that what was in the food wasn't all that bad, I read lists...but not that closely. Carageenan? Hypromellose? tocopherols? High fructose corn syrup? They had to come from somewhere. And the FDA approved them. That was good enough to consume them in moderation.
And now I wonder. Not only what they do to us, but what effect do they have on the environment? What unseen damage can they do?
I note that food isn't the only thing with an ingredient list, and the personal care aisle scares me, too. Products designed to be washed away into our water supply. With names like Polyethylene (which, by the way, is bits of plastic designed to help exfoliate. Bits of plastic and corn derivatives, bound together for eternity and washed into our water supply, where any bacteria and large particles might be cleaned up...but anything minute is likely to remain in tact and be ingested by something else, animal or human.) or ammonium lauryl sulfate (a foaming agent commonly derived from coconut or palm alcohols) what sort of effect do they have on our water supply? Or the quality of the soil they drain into?
You see, the awareness of cross contamination, and the inability to sterilize away cornstarch dust or drops of peanut oil, makes me aware that nothing vanishes from our planet. It may get absorbed, or rearranged, or diluted. But it doesn't vanish. The problem may begin, for our family, with allergen containment, but the question of "why" leads us to the bigger picture. The chemicals and GMO's whose safety I question for my family aren't easily contained. The wind blows, the bees pollinate, and flowers blossom freely. They don't know where the boundaries between organic and inorganic lay. And honestly, as a society we don't know the long term effects.
Most of us don't give it more than a fleeting thought. I know I never did. I tried to toss my water bottle into the recycle bin instead of the trash can, I parroted the idea that organic was better but I didn't really deeply care. Not until the allergies opened my eyes, and I began not only seeing the cause and effect of something as ubiquitous as food but questioning choices I'd never thought to question before.
While some studies are linking allergies to environmental causes, I'm finding that allergies are lowering our personal environmental impact in a lot of little ways. Sure, I have to drive farther to get to the grocery store that carries gluten free pasta, but I don't waste time idling in a drive through. I don't buy many single serve packages, and we gravitate toward environmentally friendly cleaning aids like baking soda and vinegar.
Truthfully, I don't know if I'm happy to know all I know. I'd be perfectly happy to still be in the dark regarding the origins of microcrystalline cellulose and astaxanthin. In fact, I don't think I'd miss being able to spell either one without a cheat sheet. Awareness breeds responsibility.
While I can't do as much as I want for the environment, awareness gives me the opportunity to do more than I might have before and allergies give me the motivation. Maybe someday my grandkids will have a planet to inherit, after all.
Welcome to my un-corny life...a series of vignettes interspersed among real food allergy (intolerance?) discussion.
Showing posts with label Earth day. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Earth day. Show all posts
Wednesday, June 29, 2011
Friday, April 22, 2011
Easter Greetings
Most people don't think of Easter as a very corn filled holiday. It's...more...carrots. And maybe celery. And...jellybeans.
Actually, for most people with food allergies, Easter celebrations can be pretty safe.
But, again, corn rears it's ugly head. Ear? Whatever.
Jelly beans may generally be free of the top 8; but their rainbow appeal generally comes from a rainbow of artificial food colorings. These are linked with behavior issues, and possibly further health problems, in some individuals. There are naturally colored jelly beans from Surf Sweets, Green Beans, and even Jelly Belly superfruits.
Unfortunately, the above are either made with corn syrup, or the corn containing citric acid.
Gummy candy is another perrenial favorite...Gummy bears fit just perfectly into the plastic colored eggs. (And of course an egg laying bunny is going to hatch red and yellow bears, right?) Surf Sweet candies, Yummy Earth candies, and Annie's Naturals all have delicious alternatives. (Containing corn)
Florida's Natural Nuggets taste good and fit well in the eggs...but again contain corn derivatives.
For a corn free candy, you might have to resort to St Claire's Hard candies. (Tasty, but not quite as seasonal)
And then there is the chocolate bunny. Nut warnings, dairy derivatives, even gluten show up in those mischievous iconic candies. Alternatives may be maple sugar shapes (I haven't seen a bunny, though), chocolates bought from a premier specialty facility like Premium Chocolatiers, or chocolate chips melted to fit various candy molds available in the market place.
The only real candy novelties safe for corn avoiders are the ones we make ourselves. But some have gotten creative with Erewhon rice cereal and homemade marshmallows to shape krisie treats, gelatin mold eggs, and shaped chocolates.
Of course...the best egg stuffers are non candy...Littlest Pet shop figurines, In My Pocket pets, and small vehicles will delight kids 3-7; as will mardi gras beads and other small party favors (these aren't great for the environment, though)
As an adult with the corn allergy (and parent to a dairy free, gluten free kid and 2 who avoid artificial colorings) I prefer to not worry about the sugary novelties.
Spice cake sounds good to me; and maybe if we have a few carrots I'll grate them in for corn free carrot cake. I'm still working on a white frosting recipe. Powdered sugar has not been easy to find, but I'm certain there is decent frosting to be had without it. (after all, people have been frosting cakes for generations...haven't they?)
The kids are looking forward to egg dyeing. Although every year I tell myself we'll find some nice, safe, all natural dyes...I got lazy (and cheap) and purchased a sponge paintng kit. We will dye 2 dozen eggs, of the cheapest brand I find, and Mr. Violets will bring what he wants to work. The rest will be a tragic waste of resources...but at least they'll serve a purpose in entertainment, art exploration, and decoration. And they'll decompose quickly, a nice Earth Day bonus.
Maybe we'll work in a short hike, or at least a trip to the park. After all...the whole point of Easter is to welcome spring back to our lives. And part of springtime is getting back outside. We'll also be attempting another garden. We've already fed a honeydew seedling to the snails in our yard, and (after putting down salt) are considering ttempting strawberry plants. They grow well and Bumblebee enjoys them. Maybe I'll even be able to handle a few despite the prevalence of seeds. (Or maybe I'll puree them and strain the seeds) At least if they're homegrown, I'll know if it was the strawberry or the 'industry standard' rinse that didn't get scrubbed off.
Actually, for most people with food allergies, Easter celebrations can be pretty safe.
But, again, corn rears it's ugly head. Ear? Whatever.
Jelly beans may generally be free of the top 8; but their rainbow appeal generally comes from a rainbow of artificial food colorings. These are linked with behavior issues, and possibly further health problems, in some individuals. There are naturally colored jelly beans from Surf Sweets, Green Beans, and even Jelly Belly superfruits.
Unfortunately, the above are either made with corn syrup, or the corn containing citric acid.
Gummy candy is another perrenial favorite...Gummy bears fit just perfectly into the plastic colored eggs. (And of course an egg laying bunny is going to hatch red and yellow bears, right?) Surf Sweet candies, Yummy Earth candies, and Annie's Naturals all have delicious alternatives. (Containing corn)
Florida's Natural Nuggets taste good and fit well in the eggs...but again contain corn derivatives.
For a corn free candy, you might have to resort to St Claire's Hard candies. (Tasty, but not quite as seasonal)
And then there is the chocolate bunny. Nut warnings, dairy derivatives, even gluten show up in those mischievous iconic candies. Alternatives may be maple sugar shapes (I haven't seen a bunny, though), chocolates bought from a premier specialty facility like Premium Chocolatiers, or chocolate chips melted to fit various candy molds available in the market place.
The only real candy novelties safe for corn avoiders are the ones we make ourselves. But some have gotten creative with Erewhon rice cereal and homemade marshmallows to shape krisie treats, gelatin mold eggs, and shaped chocolates.
Of course...the best egg stuffers are non candy...Littlest Pet shop figurines, In My Pocket pets, and small vehicles will delight kids 3-7; as will mardi gras beads and other small party favors (these aren't great for the environment, though)
As an adult with the corn allergy (and parent to a dairy free, gluten free kid and 2 who avoid artificial colorings) I prefer to not worry about the sugary novelties.
Spice cake sounds good to me; and maybe if we have a few carrots I'll grate them in for corn free carrot cake. I'm still working on a white frosting recipe. Powdered sugar has not been easy to find, but I'm certain there is decent frosting to be had without it. (after all, people have been frosting cakes for generations...haven't they?)
The kids are looking forward to egg dyeing. Although every year I tell myself we'll find some nice, safe, all natural dyes...I got lazy (and cheap) and purchased a sponge paintng kit. We will dye 2 dozen eggs, of the cheapest brand I find, and Mr. Violets will bring what he wants to work. The rest will be a tragic waste of resources...but at least they'll serve a purpose in entertainment, art exploration, and decoration. And they'll decompose quickly, a nice Earth Day bonus.
Maybe we'll work in a short hike, or at least a trip to the park. After all...the whole point of Easter is to welcome spring back to our lives. And part of springtime is getting back outside. We'll also be attempting another garden. We've already fed a honeydew seedling to the snails in our yard, and (after putting down salt) are considering ttempting strawberry plants. They grow well and Bumblebee enjoys them. Maybe I'll even be able to handle a few despite the prevalence of seeds. (Or maybe I'll puree them and strain the seeds) At least if they're homegrown, I'll know if it was the strawberry or the 'industry standard' rinse that didn't get scrubbed off.
Sunday, May 16, 2010
Sometimes, as parents, we find ourselves making difficult decisions. Having to choose between buying our kids things that will make them happy, and keeping to a budget.
Of course, as adults we know they don't need extra toys. Or candy. Or other treats.
But everyone else seems to have them, and all the other parents say "Oh, well, it's only $5, $10, $50..."
Every little bit adds up.
Although it's hard to say no sometimes, I'm proud of my dd.
Just the other night she was asking something, and she smiled and said "Mommy, I think we have just the right amount of money. Because we have enough money for rent, and to eat every day and to buy treats once in awhile. But not every day, like some people. Because that's not healthy."
I'm glad that she doesn't feel deprived.
As I look around our home I see so many things I want to upgrade. Replace. Flat out get rid of! But I pause. Practicality sets in. Anything that I would want to replace in a year, needs to stay. If it's reparable, it stays. It doesn't always get tidied up, or repaired in a timely manner, but it's relatively clean and not unsafe.
I resent our expensive allergy friendly diet, and sometimes yearn for blue box mac and cheese, frozen dinners, the ease of a drive through happy meal.
Then I look around at the world. The first glance, of course, makes me want to upgrade more. Get rid of the old sheets! The plastic toys that look used. The chairs with tattered seatcovers. The clothes that I've owned for more than a year. Go out to a restaurant, if for no other reason than so my kids know what a happy meal toy is.
The second glance is what gives me pause. The landfills are overflowing. As I toss abandoned fast food coffee cups and grease stained bags that end up in our gutter in the trash, I see a lot of overflowing oversized trashcans by the curb come trashday, and although more than half the driveways sport recycle bins, it's far fewer than 90%. And they're rarely overflowing.
There's an island of plastic floating in the middle of the Pacific ocean.
Polar Bears in the arctic, who have never heard an airplane or seen an automobile, have discernible levels of plastics and pesticides in their blood stream.
Factory farms are steadily crowding out family farms, and humane (animal) farming is struggling to remain a viable resource in any community. One quarter of American meals are eaten in restaurants. 2/3 of the remaining meals are take out or pre-prepared. The remaining quarter or so of meals are prepared using exotic techniques such as spreading condiments onto sandwich bread or microwaving vegetables.
There's a pipe spewing hundreds of thousands of gallons of crude oil into the Gulf Coast waters as I type.
It's not that the second glance makes me want to move into a redwood tree like some kind of 60's fanatic (although I remember reading "My Side of the Mountain and dreaming about it.) but it does make me want to...either save the world or go back to bed and stay there.
And how can we help the world? By living smaller. Experts (such as the Sierra Club and National Wildlife Fed, and the Slow Food Movement, and Whole Foods) suggest paying attention to where your dollars go.
With a tight budget, I do that.
Avoid unnecessary packaging. Avoid excess waste.
Again, from a budgeting perspective, this is paramount.
Don't buy things you don't need. And keep the things you own in good condition, so you can reuse them or pass them on.
As someone without a lot of money to spread around, I do this. Garage sales never seem to work for us, and since I rarely have much extra cash to donate where I want to I assuage my conscience by sending used goods to places they can be put to the best use...if not a friend or family member, to a local job rehab center or the Salvation Army.
Reduce. Reuse. Recycle. Respect our resources.
When I'm tempted to buy junk, or feeling bad that I can't, I remind myself of those 4 Rs.
Like my daughter, I'm glad we're 'poor'. It's forced us to make hard decisions, to focus on what really matters, and to lighten the imprint we make on the Earth. Unlike her, I'm surprised that my kids seem to have a greater appreciation for their toys. They pull out the Barbies and create elaborate games. Other parents look askance when I talk about the intricate Littlest Pet Shop set up the girls were fighting over.
Of course, maybe it's healthier to get outside and ride a bike. But when that's not feasible, I'd rather they have a box of scrap paper to build origami cranes, or a closet full of board games, or a plastic tub of plastic animals to turn to than a TV to turn on. (yes, we own a TV. No, it is not hooked up to cable.)
And I'm really surprised to hear the reinforcement come from her mouth. She's glad we can't afford too many treats? For sweets in lunches every day? She's glad I don't buy her too many toys?
I'm sure I could do a better job at being green, and raising green kids. I could walk more, or buy a bike. I could make a more concerted effort to get to the farmer's market. And I do intend to work on continuing to lessen my carbon print. But for now, I'm going to be happy that our budget keeps us (somewhat) green. And my kids know it.
I just hope that she continues to see the positive...and not resent the sacrifices.
Of course, as adults we know they don't need extra toys. Or candy. Or other treats.
But everyone else seems to have them, and all the other parents say "Oh, well, it's only $5, $10, $50..."
Every little bit adds up.
Although it's hard to say no sometimes, I'm proud of my dd.
Just the other night she was asking something, and she smiled and said "Mommy, I think we have just the right amount of money. Because we have enough money for rent, and to eat every day and to buy treats once in awhile. But not every day, like some people. Because that's not healthy."
I'm glad that she doesn't feel deprived.
As I look around our home I see so many things I want to upgrade. Replace. Flat out get rid of! But I pause. Practicality sets in. Anything that I would want to replace in a year, needs to stay. If it's reparable, it stays. It doesn't always get tidied up, or repaired in a timely manner, but it's relatively clean and not unsafe.
I resent our expensive allergy friendly diet, and sometimes yearn for blue box mac and cheese, frozen dinners, the ease of a drive through happy meal.
Then I look around at the world. The first glance, of course, makes me want to upgrade more. Get rid of the old sheets! The plastic toys that look used. The chairs with tattered seatcovers. The clothes that I've owned for more than a year. Go out to a restaurant, if for no other reason than so my kids know what a happy meal toy is.
The second glance is what gives me pause. The landfills are overflowing. As I toss abandoned fast food coffee cups and grease stained bags that end up in our gutter in the trash, I see a lot of overflowing oversized trashcans by the curb come trashday, and although more than half the driveways sport recycle bins, it's far fewer than 90%. And they're rarely overflowing.
There's an island of plastic floating in the middle of the Pacific ocean.
Polar Bears in the arctic, who have never heard an airplane or seen an automobile, have discernible levels of plastics and pesticides in their blood stream.
Factory farms are steadily crowding out family farms, and humane (animal) farming is struggling to remain a viable resource in any community. One quarter of American meals are eaten in restaurants. 2/3 of the remaining meals are take out or pre-prepared. The remaining quarter or so of meals are prepared using exotic techniques such as spreading condiments onto sandwich bread or microwaving vegetables.
There's a pipe spewing hundreds of thousands of gallons of crude oil into the Gulf Coast waters as I type.
It's not that the second glance makes me want to move into a redwood tree like some kind of 60's fanatic (although I remember reading "My Side of the Mountain and dreaming about it.) but it does make me want to...either save the world or go back to bed and stay there.
And how can we help the world? By living smaller. Experts (such as the Sierra Club and National Wildlife Fed, and the Slow Food Movement, and Whole Foods) suggest paying attention to where your dollars go.
With a tight budget, I do that.
Avoid unnecessary packaging. Avoid excess waste.
Again, from a budgeting perspective, this is paramount.
Don't buy things you don't need. And keep the things you own in good condition, so you can reuse them or pass them on.
As someone without a lot of money to spread around, I do this. Garage sales never seem to work for us, and since I rarely have much extra cash to donate where I want to I assuage my conscience by sending used goods to places they can be put to the best use...if not a friend or family member, to a local job rehab center or the Salvation Army.
Reduce. Reuse. Recycle. Respect our resources.
When I'm tempted to buy junk, or feeling bad that I can't, I remind myself of those 4 Rs.
Like my daughter, I'm glad we're 'poor'. It's forced us to make hard decisions, to focus on what really matters, and to lighten the imprint we make on the Earth. Unlike her, I'm surprised that my kids seem to have a greater appreciation for their toys. They pull out the Barbies and create elaborate games. Other parents look askance when I talk about the intricate Littlest Pet Shop set up the girls were fighting over.
Of course, maybe it's healthier to get outside and ride a bike. But when that's not feasible, I'd rather they have a box of scrap paper to build origami cranes, or a closet full of board games, or a plastic tub of plastic animals to turn to than a TV to turn on. (yes, we own a TV. No, it is not hooked up to cable.)
And I'm really surprised to hear the reinforcement come from her mouth. She's glad we can't afford too many treats? For sweets in lunches every day? She's glad I don't buy her too many toys?
I'm sure I could do a better job at being green, and raising green kids. I could walk more, or buy a bike. I could make a more concerted effort to get to the farmer's market. And I do intend to work on continuing to lessen my carbon print. But for now, I'm going to be happy that our budget keeps us (somewhat) green. And my kids know it.
I just hope that she continues to see the positive...and not resent the sacrifices.
Saturday, December 12, 2009
It's beginning to look a lot like...
After begging, pleading, beguiling, and wheedling, Ms, Bumblebee has gotten her wish. We set up our Christmas tree, decorated it and have begun tucking little remembrances underneath of it.
I've been reading a lot about the evils of plastic, paint, and outdated chemicals (Not to mention the questionable current ones) lately, So as we pulled out dusty boxes and started our decorating process, my thoughts slid from logistics and Christmas carols to lead paint and BPA.
I let my mind wander to the ongoing debate of a green Christmas. Which is more environmentally friendly? A fake tree, or a "real" pine tree? When a living one just isn't feasible, anyways?
Most arguments seem to surround the length of usable time we get out of the average artificial tree. I've seen estimates ranging from 3 to 10 years. And since plastics take forever (yes, forever...I'm not hyperbolizing.) to break down in landfills, often ending up in a huge plastic island in the middle of the ocean, the cost just doesn't seem worth the benefit. However...it takes nearly as long for a tree to grow. Even under the best of responsible farming practices.
There are also allergies, bugs, sap, etc to contend with. Not to mention potential pesticides and other treatments used on affordable trees.
My tree is artificial. It's also not entirely plastic, and probably covered in lead based paint. You see, it once belonged to my grandparents, circa the late 60's. Well before I was born (and no, it's not glittery or pink. It may have been crafted before technicolor trees were in vogue, I'm not actually sure. The box itself disintegrated and the instructions have long since vanished. But it's faux pine, intended to look realistic.) When my parents moved, their lovely tall tree no longer fit in the living room. They had to choose between cutting a hole in the ceiling, and replacing the Christmas tree. The ceiling won, their tree went to my Grandpa's church and my Grandma's old tree went into my parent's living room. I have fond memories of helping my dad sort through multicolored branch tips as we spread everything out in the living room and crawled around trying to remember which color came first. Eventually my parents tired of the stress, and we tried chopping our own, or shopping at a corner lot, but I still vividly remember "our" tree.
So when I had kids, and decided it was time for a full sized tree on a pint sized budget, I called up my parents and asked if they happened to still have the pieces in their garage.
"You don't want that old thing," they said.
But I did.
And now it just wouldn't be Christmas without a tangle of branches to ease into pre-drilled holes, a tumble of "fuzzies" to hide the wooden dowel trunk (Does anyone know how I can replace these? We seem to lose a few every year) and the kids teetering between "The tree, the tree!" and "I don't think it's going to work, Mommy..." and "It's looking right! It's looking right!"
My tree is artificial. Putting it up might be a hassle, and taking it down twice as bad, but in the end, it's our tradition. We'll keep it in our garage, instead of the landfill, lead based paint and all. We'll wash our hands, and avoid chewing on fake pine needles. If I were to stop using it, it would stop being "green" and end up in a landfill.
So we'll sit in front of the twinkling lights, letting our thoughts go. And enjoy our "real" tree.
(And before anyone mentions it's bedraggled state, once it's decorated, I get plenty of comments on it looking real!)
I've been reading a lot about the evils of plastic, paint, and outdated chemicals (Not to mention the questionable current ones) lately, So as we pulled out dusty boxes and started our decorating process, my thoughts slid from logistics and Christmas carols to lead paint and BPA.
I let my mind wander to the ongoing debate of a green Christmas. Which is more environmentally friendly? A fake tree, or a "real" pine tree? When a living one just isn't feasible, anyways?
Most arguments seem to surround the length of usable time we get out of the average artificial tree. I've seen estimates ranging from 3 to 10 years. And since plastics take forever (yes, forever...I'm not hyperbolizing.) to break down in landfills, often ending up in a huge plastic island in the middle of the ocean, the cost just doesn't seem worth the benefit. However...it takes nearly as long for a tree to grow. Even under the best of responsible farming practices.
There are also allergies, bugs, sap, etc to contend with. Not to mention potential pesticides and other treatments used on affordable trees.
My tree is artificial. It's also not entirely plastic, and probably covered in lead based paint. You see, it once belonged to my grandparents, circa the late 60's. Well before I was born (and no, it's not glittery or pink. It may have been crafted before technicolor trees were in vogue, I'm not actually sure. The box itself disintegrated and the instructions have long since vanished. But it's faux pine, intended to look realistic.) When my parents moved, their lovely tall tree no longer fit in the living room. They had to choose between cutting a hole in the ceiling, and replacing the Christmas tree. The ceiling won, their tree went to my Grandpa's church and my Grandma's old tree went into my parent's living room. I have fond memories of helping my dad sort through multicolored branch tips as we spread everything out in the living room and crawled around trying to remember which color came first. Eventually my parents tired of the stress, and we tried chopping our own, or shopping at a corner lot, but I still vividly remember "our" tree.So when I had kids, and decided it was time for a full sized tree on a pint sized budget, I called up my parents and asked if they happened to still have the pieces in their garage.
"You don't want that old thing," they said.
But I did.
And now it just wouldn't be Christmas without a tangle of branches to ease into pre-drilled holes, a tumble of "fuzzies" to hide the wooden dowel trunk (Does anyone know how I can replace these? We seem to lose a few every year) and the kids teetering between "The tree, the tree!" and "I don't think it's going to work, Mommy..." and "It's looking right! It's looking right!"My tree is artificial. Putting it up might be a hassle, and taking it down twice as bad, but in the end, it's our tradition. We'll keep it in our garage, instead of the landfill, lead based paint and all. We'll wash our hands, and avoid chewing on fake pine needles. If I were to stop using it, it would stop being "green" and end up in a landfill.
So we'll sit in front of the twinkling lights, letting our thoughts go. And enjoy our "real" tree.
(And before anyone mentions it's bedraggled state, once it's decorated, I get plenty of comments on it looking real!)
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Getting Greener...
It's Earth Day. (Or was when I first started and forgot to post this entry)
The sun is shining (Thankfully not quite so hot as it was yesterday, or the day before); the garden is growing, and Bumblebee chose today to debut her brand new stainless steel bottle tote.
It's a work in progress. She says it hurt her shoulder, so the next proto-type will include a shoulder pad. We'll get there, and we'll grow greener doing it.
I'm still a bit skeptical about our garden. Although I'm elated to see green sprouts popping out of the ground, stretching their leaves to the sky, I have to remind myself that it's only taken them twice the germination time cited on the seed package.
Is it the weather, which clouded over and rained for a week as soon as we gently tucked them in the warm, dark earth? Is it the seeds, which were purchased on sale from another season's guaranteed to grow crop (seeds are seeds, and they ought to last if they didn't get wet or otherwise damaged) ? Or is my brown thumb rearing it's ugly head?
Maybe it's just stress...since the raised bed does not get a LOT of sun. None of the yard does.
However, the few nasturtiums that returned from last year seem happy, and I have a stunted looking rose that bolted into something resembling a tree in it's quest for light, and the fairy house looks pretty wild in the back nook. The yard is still, well, not tidy or anywhere resembling something that can be shown off. But it's green. And it gets us outdoors and excited.
(until Penguin sees a snail and runs for cover, anyways.)
The sun is shining (Thankfully not quite so hot as it was yesterday, or the day before); the garden is growing, and Bumblebee chose today to debut her brand new stainless steel bottle tote.
It's a work in progress. She says it hurt her shoulder, so the next proto-type will include a shoulder pad. We'll get there, and we'll grow greener doing it.
I'm still a bit skeptical about our garden. Although I'm elated to see green sprouts popping out of the ground, stretching their leaves to the sky, I have to remind myself that it's only taken them twice the germination time cited on the seed package.
Is it the weather, which clouded over and rained for a week as soon as we gently tucked them in the warm, dark earth? Is it the seeds, which were purchased on sale from another season's guaranteed to grow crop (seeds are seeds, and they ought to last if they didn't get wet or otherwise damaged) ? Or is my brown thumb rearing it's ugly head?Maybe it's just stress...since the raised bed does not get a LOT of sun. None of the yard does.
However, the few nasturtiums that returned from last year seem happy, and I have a stunted looking rose that bolted into something resembling a tree in it's quest for light, and the fairy house looks pretty wild in the back nook. The yard is still, well, not tidy or anywhere resembling something that can be shown off. But it's green. And it gets us outdoors and excited.
(until Penguin sees a snail and runs for cover, anyways.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)